requestId:684d90e1e7c609.19578688.
Analysis of Yangming Bamboo: An inter-scientific dialogue between Yangming and Botany
Author: He Jun (Doctoral Supervisor of the School of Philosophy at Yudan University)
Liu Su (Advanced Engineer of Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden)
Source: Zhejiang Journal, Issue 1, 2020
Time: Jesus January 19, 2020
Editor’s Note:The Supervisor and Director of this journal href=”https://twsugarhug.org/”>Sweetheart Garden The Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Social Sciences has been the main town of Yangming Studies for many years. The “Yangming Studies” column of this journal has been around for a long time, and we are in response to this discussion. Gezhu is a job with fresh and bright scars in Wang Yangming’s life, but the Yangming academic community only mentioned it and did not conduct in-depth research. This journal would like to organize an interdisciplinary dialogue on this topic. After more than a year of preparation, the dialogue was finally held on the Huidan Dali Guanghua Building on September 14, 2019. Both experts who participated in the conversation had academic lectures and had great results. The dialogue begins with the fact that the sun has failed to investigate things, discusses the differences in research on botany and traditional Chinese research on things, and compares the differences in research objects, paths, results, etc. developed in this life, and finally leads to the ability of the integration of Chinese and Western thinking. This article is processed on the basis of dialogue recording.
Dialogue Expert
He Jun, a special professor of Philosophy at Yudan University, was appointed as a doctoral supervisor at the School of Philosophy. Liu Su, a senior engineer at Chenshan Botanical Garden in Shanghai
Planning
Ludunji, Editor of Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, Editorial
Record
Fu Leng, Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, He Jun:The work of Wang Yangmingge’s bamboo care is a major event in Yangming’s journey, but it is often written in Yangming’s discussion and does not conduct in-depth analysis. Why is this so? I think the masters think that was a simple and simple task that Zhu Zi learned during the young Yangming and practiced Zhu Zi’s learning process, and did not have much thoughtful connotation. Although this work has some major ideological changes for Yangming, this work itself is not worthy of profound analysis. Tomorrow, Zhejiang Journal will set you and I to try to talk about this. You are a botanist and Bao Haimei and has discussed the history of science and technology and philosophy of science and technology. I am a traditional researcher of Yangming. Our conversations may gain some new understanding of this problem.
Liu Su: As a postgraduate, I am very fortunate to have such an opportunity to talk to Teacher He. Just like Teacher He I am now engaged in botany research and research on the history of science and technology and philosophy of science and technology, which includes sorting out the development and evolution of modern science and technology thinking. This also makes me pay more attention to two questions about Chinese traditional thinking: First, why has modern science and technology not been produced? Second, how do we give Chinese traditional thinking and modern science and technology tomorrow Thinking finds a suitable way to integrate and connect? As the main thought in Chinese philosophy, I am particularly interested.
He Jun: We will start with the work of Yangminggezhu. This happened when Yangming was 15 years old, when he served his father in Beijing. This age should be full of fantasies The situation was also full of courage and energy to explore. When the court had a problem, Yang Ming blew up the memorial to present it, but was detained by his father and severely criticized him, which was enough to represent it. After this incident, the story of “The Year of Teachers and Teachers of Yang Ming” was recorded by Dehong, and the matter of Gezhu was found, which was “to learn the Song Confucians’ learning of things, and to ask Zhu Xi to read it in his book, thinking about the things in the whole country. One day, the mainstream thinking was complete at that time. Zhu Zi’s learning. One of the most basic thoughts that people should make their behavior based on their understanding of the truth and be wise; and to be wise, they need to investigate things and gradually gain knowledge of things by studying things. In simple terms, studying things and reasoning is the same as the different ways of becoming a saint. Yang Ming was determined to become a saint, so he also wanted to look at the past He arranged for his friend to go all the way to the bamboo in his yard. As a result, his friend and Yangming both failed one after another. Not only did they not learn the principles of bamboo growth from the ge bamboo, but they also made themselves sick. As a result, Yangming thought that he was not worthy of becoming a saint, so he turned to learning lyrics and dealing with the business. We will see this tomorrow and we can understand a thought of Yangming. href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-story-share”>BaobaoLu Su:How should bamboo be shaped in tomorrow’s botany? Determine your goal. If so href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-story-share”>inclusive pipelines classification, then it is necessary to observe some key shape characteristics of bamboo—such as growth shape, sheath, tongue, patch, branching conditions—and other visual observations; if you want to do psychological experiments, then you need to establish a practical experiment group and matchAccording to the group, the two groups guarantee that only one condition is different, “the rest of the situations are the same.” If the two groups later have significant differences on a certain characteristic, then there is a reason for this condition to be controlled, which leads to the subsequent results. It is obvious that these modern scientific and technological methods are not available in the years and regions of the Ming Dynasty.
He Jun: The things that Zhu Zi talked about are not just object-oriented. Of course, this is the most basic object. In addition, Zhu Xi’s concept of studying matters and sanitation was later used to translate physics for tens of thousands of months. Do you have to learn more from her, do you know? ”. In addition to the object of interest, Zhu Zi’s object of object also includes human activities, books, and even human energy levels. Because of the general nature of the object of investigation, some scholars now emphasize that the thinking of studying objects has nothing to do with scientific concepts, and I think it is wrong. Indeed, Zhu Xi’s thinking on studying things is a part of his entire philosophy, not a scientific concept. However, even in the East, science is a very late concept. Although Zhu Xi’s study of things and practice is not a scientific concept, it does not mean that it is not scientific. After modern times, when I learned the Oriental world, I could use the concept of studying things to translate physics, which actually represented the scientific nature in Zhu Zi’s Philosophy. I even believe that the May Fourth New Civilization Movement has defeated the entire Song and Ming sciences, including Zhu Zi and Yang Ming, to build a new civilization, but the positive scientific and civilians proposed in the heart is not the Chen Yu secretly who studied things and Yang Ming, who became a confidant, but he may not have realized it himself.
Liu Su:Tomorrow, science is not just about natural science, but also about social sciences that study various aspects of human society. In natural science, there are also psychological and mental studies of people’s psychological and mental activities. In recent decades, it has been in line with the theoretical system of social science, forming a “level-by-layer recovery” system of social science-mind-neurological psychology. Even some school trials establish common basic laws in this large scientific system, just like the evolutionary mind school uses evolutionary schema to engage in this entire “personal learning”. Therefore, if tomorrow’s science is also a study of things, then it is not all objects outside of people, but also people themselves.
He Jun: It is more irritating to know the character than to understand the matter. In terms of meaning, pattern is used as a word, which means contact and infer. The master often no longer goes deeper. Why do we need to use the word “天” when contacting and deducing? The most obvious meaning of the word “Grid” is a lattice. When plaid is used as a verb, the lattice of investigating things is actually a dynamic noun. Why use the noun grid as a word? What does this dynamic term imply? When we say put a bunch of things in the grid, oursIt should mean that the pile of things should be classified and then placed into the corresponding grid according to the different categories. Therefore, the contact and inference of objects implies a very specific cognitive activity, which is to classify the cognitive object. We understand that classification is the end of knowledge. Human perception is realized through the classification of objects. In this way, we seem to understand that Yangmingzhu is a practical experience of thinking, but it seems that it is not just a practical